![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Unlocking Canadian Capital - Exhibits to John Dobson and Ian Soutar PresentationExhibit 1: The Power of Compound Interest $1,000 compounded annually at the following rates over a 40-year time period produces the following returns: (40 years is taken to illustrate a young person of 25 saving until retirement at 65). 20% $1,500,000 15% 268,000 12% 93,000 10% 45,000 9% 31,000 8% 22,000 6% 10,000 $1 doubling annually for 20 years produces $1 million. Three government actions cause the investor to receive significantly less. 1. Capital Gains Tax: A rate of 40% applies to taxable income above $60,000. 2. Inflation: Since the arrival of the Capital Gains Tax in 1972, the purchasing power of the Canadian dollar has declined to 25%. The Capital Gains Tax rate is much greater than 40% when applied to the real purchasing power of the original investment dollar. 3. Currency devaluation: Since 1976 the purchasing power of the Canadian currency has dropped from $1.00 to $0.72 in terms of the US dollar. Investors preserving their purchasing power by owning foreign assets must also pay a capital gains tax on this loss. Let's look at some scenarios:
Conclusion Excluding the big inflation and devaluation losses - the 40% Capital Gains Tax results in the following:
The individual loses $1,407,000 of wealth creation so that government gains $22,000!! Not a great trade-off for Canada! Clearly, to create wealth and take advantage of savings, the investor should aim for long-term holdings and high rates of return. It is difficult to build a competitive country with this attack on wealth. Canada's great growth years of the 1950s and 1960s took place before 1972 when Canadians enjoyed NO capital gains tax. Exhibit 2: Wealth Creation Means Job Creation Case A: Capital Gains Tax Effect on Real Return
Assumptions: 25 year holding period. If the inflation assumption is changed to 3.5% the respective true capital gains rate would be 107%, 81%, 71%, and 59%. Case B: Actual Experience of Formula Growth Fund Investors
Conditions: 25 year holding period. ConclusionsA. Capital creation is much more rapid in lower tax regimes: Hong Kong and the US create wealth at 4.7 and 2.2 times the rate of Canada, respectively. This means that assets will increasingly be owned by investors from lower tax regimes. B. Investors must invest aggressively to overcome the effects of inflation and capital gains tax (not a traditional Canadian approach to investing). C. The government must set up the RRSP vehicle as a measure for helping Canadians to look after themselves, not as a wealth creation vehicle. Notes*Proportion of real return paid to government. Exhibit 3Investor 1Child gets $1,000 per year for 21 years With taxes Income below $8,000: 0% Investor 2McGill Commerce Graduate Saves $5,000 per year Investor 3 Secretary Saves $5,000 per year
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems. |