|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Government Expenditures |
|
Economic Freedom Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of GDP |
|
|
|
|
 |
Part 1: The Economic Freedom Ratings for the Components and Various Area and |
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Indexes: 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990 and 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The numbers in parentheses indicate the actual values for the components.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Economic Freedom |
|
|
1975 |
1980 |
1985 |
1990 |
1995 |
I. Money and Inflation |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
5.2 |
|
3.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
2.6 |
|
(a) Annual Money Growth (last 5 yrs.) |
|
3 |
(16.6) |
6 |
(10.6) |
3 |
(17.4) |
1 |
(38.2) |
3 |
(17.3) |
(b) Inflation Variablity (last 5 yrs.) |
|
|
3 |
(6.8) |
5 |
(4.7) |
2 |
(13.1) |
1 |
(16.7) |
5 |
(4.1) |
(c) Ownership of Foreign Currency |
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
(d) Maint. of Bank Account Abroad |
|
|
0 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Government Operation |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
8.0 |
|
8.0 |
|
5.6 |
|
5.9 |
|
(a) Gov't Consump. (% of Total Consump.) |
|
10 |
(8.2) |
10 |
(9.0) |
10 |
(8.1) |
10 |
(6.9) |
10 |
(9.0) |
(b) Government Enterprises |
|
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
(c) Price Controls |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4 |
|
6 |
|
(d) Entry Into Business |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
5.0 |
|
(e) Legal System |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.0 |
|
(f) Avoidance of Neg. Interest Rates |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Takings |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
4.9 |
|
4.5 |
|
4.9 |
|
9.1 |
|
(a) Transfers and Subsidies (% of GDP) |
|
8 |
(2.5) |
9 |
(1.6) |
8 |
(2.5) |
9 |
(1.5) |
9 |
(1.4) |
(b) Marginal Tax Rates (Top Rate) |
|
|
0 |
(73) |
0 |
(73) |
0 |
(73.1) |
0 |
(73) |
9 |
(25) |
(c) Conscription |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. International Sector |
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
1.5 |
|
3.3 |
|
2.2 |
|
3.1 |
|
(a) Taxes on International Trade (Avg.) |
|
0 |
(16.1) |
1 |
(9.2) |
4 |
(6.5) |
3 |
(7.8) |
1 |
(12.2) |
(b) Black Market Exchange Rates (Prem.) |
|
3 |
(28) |
2 |
(37) |
4 |
(14) |
1 |
(66) |
7 |
(2) |
(c) Size of Trade Sector (% of GDP) |
|
|
3 |
(28.0) |
1 |
(24.1) |
3 |
(28.5) |
3 |
(31.2) |
2 |
(27.8) |
(d) Capital Transactions with Foreigners |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Freedom Rating |
|
|
3.3 |
|
4.5 |
|
4.5 |
|
3.6 |
|
5.6 |
|
Ranking of Country |
|
|
|
72 |
|
37 |
|
39 |
|
84 |
|
52 |
|
Part 2: Recent Economic Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population 1996: |
8.1 |
|
Real Per Capita GDP |
: |
1996= |
$3,460 |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
(in 1995 U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Annual Rate of Change (1985-96): |
2.1% |
|
|
Avg. Growth Rate: |
|
1980-90= |
-1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1990-96= |
0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Indicators:* |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
Change in Real GDP: Aggregate |
1.6 |
4.1 |
-5.8 |
1.0 |
8.0 |
3.0 |
4.3 |
4.8 |
7.3 |
: Per Capita |
-0.5 |
2.0 |
-7.7 |
-1.4 |
5.5 |
0.0 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
5.0 |
Inflation Rate (CPI) |
48.4 |
34.6 |
79.9 |
7.9 |
5.2 |
2.8 |
14.3 |
4.2 |
4.0 |
Change in Money Supply: (M1) |
51.3 |
25.9 |
40.5 |
27.4 |
26.0 |
16.6 |
-3.9 |
20.3 |
25.3 |
: (M2) |
51.4 |
28.9 |
38.8 |
40.9 |
32.2 |
22.8 |
6.3 |
18.9 |
20.1 |
Investment/GDP Ratio |
39.0 |
28.0 |
21.9 |
20.3 |
20.3 |
22.0 |
22.7 |
24.2 |
23.2 |
Size of Trade Sector (% of GDP) |
34.4 |
33.7 |
31.2 |
26.9 |
26.1 |
25.3 |
25.8 |
27.8 |
- |
Total Gov't Exp./GDP Ratio |
18.9 |
16.6 |
13.7 |
12.6 |
14.2 |
16.4 |
17.5 |
14.6 |
14.9 |
Central Government Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit (-) or Surplus (+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of GDP |
-0.7 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
-0.6 |
-2.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
Unemployment Rate |
19.1 |
18.9 |
21.0 |
19.6 |
20.3 |
19.9 |
16.0 |
15.8 |
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The figures in this table are in percent form. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After years of monetary instability, regulatory restrictions,
discriminatory taxes and economic stagnation, the Dominican Republic has taken some modest
steps toward economic freedom in the 1990s. The economic freedom rating of this country
rose from 3.6 in 1990 to 5.6 in 1995. During the same period, its ranking jumped from 84th
to 52nd.
The primary reasons for the improvement of the 1990s were:
- increased monetary and price stability (note the sharp reduction in
the growth rate of the money supply between 1990 and 1995 and the accompanying lower and
more stable rate of inflation);
- relaxation of both interest rate and exchange rate controls; and
- a reduction in tax ratesthe top marginal rate was cut from 73%
in 1990 to 25% in 1995.
Much more needs to be done. Regulatory restrictions limiting entry
into business should be relaxed. Lower tariffs and liberalization of trade is badly
needed. (Note that the size of the trade sector is much smaller than would be expected for
a country of this size and location.) Citizens should be permitted to maintain foreign
currency bank accounts and institutional changes designed to reinforce and add credibility
to the recent moves toward monetary and price stability would also be helpful. The major
weakness of this economy, however, is its highly discretionary and often ambiguous legal
structure. Moves toward greater transparency and more clearly defined rule of law would do
a great deal to promote both economic freedom and progress.
Perhaps the climate for such changes is improving. The modest moves
toward economic freedom during the 1990s were accompanied by improved economic
performance. In contrast with the economic decline of the 1980s, real GDP has grown at a
robust 5.5% during the last five years.