![[Search]](/img/navbar/searchoff.gif)
![[Media Releases]](/img/navbar/mediaoff.gif)
![[Events]](/img/navbar/eventsoff.gif)
![[Online Publications]](/img/navbar/onlineoff.gif)
![[Order Publications]](/img/navbar/orderoff.gif)
![[Student]](/img/navbar/studentoff.gif)
![[Radio]](/img/navbar/radiooff.gif)
![[National Media Archive]](/img/navbar/archiveoff.gif)
![[Membership]](/img/navbar/membershipoff.gif)
![[Other Resources]](/img/navbar/resourcesoff.gif)
![[About Us]](/img/navbar/aboutoff.gif)

The Economic Freedom Network
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Government Expenditures |
Economic Freedom Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of GDP |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1: The Economic Freedom Ratings for the Components and Various Area and |
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Indexes: 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990 and 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The numbers in parentheses indicate the actual values for the components.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Economic Freedom |
|
|
1975 |
1980 |
1985 |
1990 |
1995 |
|
I. Money and Inflation |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
9.4 |
|
9.7 |
|
9.1 |
|
9.7 |
|
(a) Annual Money Growth (last 5 yrs.) |
|
6 |
(10.5) |
8 |
(7.0) |
9 |
(5.1) |
7 |
(10.2) |
9 |
(4.8) |
(b) Inflation Variablity (last 5 yrs.) |
|
|
10 |
(0.9) |
10 |
(0.5) |
10 |
(1.0) |
10 |
(0.7) |
10 |
(1.0) |
(c) Ownership of Foreign Currency |
|
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
(d) Maint. of Bank Account Abroad |
|
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Government Operation |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
4.9 |
|
4.9 |
|
6.4 |
|
6.8 |
|
(a) Gov't Consump. (% of Total Consump.) |
1 |
(26.5) |
1 |
(26.3) |
1 |
(26.1) |
2 |
(25.2) |
2 |
(25.5) |
(b) Government Enterprises |
|
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
(c) Price Controls |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
9 |
|
9 |
|
(d) Entry Into Business |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7.5 |
|
(e) Legal System |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7.5 |
|
(f) Avoidance of Neg. Interest Rates |
|
|
8 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Takings |
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
2.2 |
|
1.7 |
|
2.2 |
|
1.8 |
|
(a) Transfers and Subsidies (% of GDP) |
|
2 |
(17.4) |
2 |
(17.6) |
2 |
(19.0) |
2 |
(17.9) |
1 |
(21.6) |
(b) Marginal Tax Rates (Top Rate) |
|
|
4 |
(56) |
3 |
(56) |
2 |
(56) |
3 |
(56) |
3 |
(57) |
(c) Conscription |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. International Sector |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
9.0 |
|
9.8 |
|
9.7 |
|
9.2 |
|
(a) Taxes on International Trade (Avg.) |
|
10 |
(0.0) |
10 |
(0.0) |
10 |
(0.0) |
10 |
(0.0) |
10 |
(0.0) |
(b) Black Market Exchange Rates (Prem.) |
|
10 |
(0) |
10 |
(0) |
10 |
(0) |
10 |
(0) |
10 |
(0) |
(c) Size of Trade Sector (% of GDP) |
|
|
6 |
(23.2) |
7 |
(26.7) |
9 |
(30.8) |
8 |
(29.0) |
5 |
(22.5) |
(d) Capital Transactions with Foreigners |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Freedom Rating |
|
|
5.9 |
|
6.0 |
|
6.1 |
|
6.4 |
|
6.4 |
|
Ranking of Country |
|
|
|
13 |
|
10 |
|
14 |
|
14 |
|
25 |
|
Part 2: Recent Economic Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population 1996: |
81.9 |
|
Real Per Capita GDP |
: |
1996 = |
$21,387 |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
(in 1995 U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Annual Rate of Change (1985-96): |
0.4% |
|
|
Avg. Growth Rate: |
1980-90= |
1.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1990-96= |
2.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Indicators:* |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
Change in Real GDP: Aggregate |
3.6 |
3.7 |
5.9 |
4.9 |
1.8 |
-1.7 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
: Per Capita |
3.2 |
3.3 |
5.5 |
4.5 |
1.4 |
-2.1 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
Inflation Rate (CPI) |
1.3 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
Change in Money Supply: (M1) |
11.7 |
5.7 |
27.9 |
4.2 |
11.5 |
8.8 |
4.9 |
7.1 |
11.2 |
: (M2) |
5.8 |
5.1 |
18.6 |
6.4 |
7.9 |
11.6 |
2.5 |
4.6 |
7.7 |
Investment/GDP Ratio |
22.8 |
23.6 |
24.6 |
25.9 |
25.1 |
23.9 |
24.5 |
22.7 |
22.4 |
Size of Trade Sector (% of GDP) |
27.0 |
28.8 |
29.0 |
30.7 |
30.0 |
21.9 |
22.4 |
22.5 |
- |
Total Gov't Exp./GDP Ratio |
46.3 |
44.8 |
45.1 |
47.9 |
48.5 |
49.5 |
48.9 |
50.6 |
51.0 |
General Government Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit (-) or Surplus (+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of GDP |
-2.2 |
+0.1 |
-2.1 |
-3.3 |
-2.8 |
-3.5 |
-2.4 |
-3.5 |
-3.9 |
Unemployment Rate |
7.6 |
6.9 |
6.2 |
7.3 |
7.7 |
8.9 |
9.6 |
9.4 |
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The figures in this table are in percent form. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Prior to 1991, data are for West Germany only. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p Preliminary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While the economic freedom rating of Germany has improved slightly
during the last two decades, its relative position has fallen as other countries have
liberalized their economies. In 1995, the German economy ranked 25th (tied with Argentina,
Bolivia and Chile), down from its 14th place ranking in 1990 and 10th place finish in
1980.
Monetary and price stability, freedom to maintain bank accounts in
other currencies, a stable and competitive credit market, and a relatively free trade
sector constitute the strengths of this economy. There are three major weaknesses: a high
level of government consumption, a large transfer sector, and high tax rates. Throughout
most of the last two decades, approximately 25% of the consumption expenditures have been
allocated by the government rather than directed by markets. During the same period, 20%
of GDP has been consistently taxed away from its earner and transferred to someone else.
Government expenditures now account for more than half of GDP. Of course, big government
means high taxes. Since many high-income countries cut taxes during the last decades,
Germanys top marginal tax rate of 56% is among the highest in the world. (Note: if
the surtax imposed on church membership were counted, the top rate would exceed 60%.)
Several political leaders, including the finance minister, have proposed substantial
reductions in tax rates, but the tax cut proposals face an uncertain future as the German
economy stagnates and the budget deficit increases.
The German economy needs economic liberalization. The highly
regulated German labor market is inflexible. This inflexibility, along with generous
transfer benefits, has pushed the unemployment rate to its highest level in fifty years.
The German social security system needs liberal reformthe provision of private
sector investment options, for example. Given its price stability, strong and competitive
trade sector, and high investment rate, this economy will probably continue to perform
reasonably well in the future. If Germany continues on its present course, however, its
future income relative to other countries will almost surely decline.
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
| |
|
|
|
Last Modified: Wednesday, October 20, 1999.
|
|