|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Government Expenditures |
|
Economic Freedom Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of GDP |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1: The Economic Freedom Ratings for the Components and Various Area and |
|
|
|
Summary Indexes: 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990 and 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The numbers in parentheses indicate the actual values for the components.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Economic Freedom |
|
|
1975 |
1980 |
1985 |
1990 |
1995 |
|
|
I. Money and Inflation |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
2.8 |
|
6.0 |
|
3.6 |
|
9.4 |
|
15.7 |
(a) Annual Money Growth (last 5 yrs.) |
|
1 |
(32.9) |
6 |
(11.1) |
10 |
(2.8) |
2 |
(18.6) |
9 |
(5.3) |
1 |
(b) Inflation Variablity (last 5 yrs.) |
|
|
1 |
(20.1) |
3 |
(8.0) |
9 |
(1.4) |
9 |
(1.3) |
9 |
(1.3) |
1 |
(c) Ownership of Foreign Currency |
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
10 |
|
1 |
(d) Maint. of Bank Account Abroad |
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
10 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. Government Operation |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
6.5 |
|
7.2 |
|
5.9 |
|
7.1 |
|
34.6 |
(a) Gov't Consump. (% of Total Consump.) |
|
7 |
(15.2) |
7 |
(15.7) |
7 |
(14.7) |
7 |
(15.2) |
7 |
(15.8) |
1 |
(b) Government Enterprises |
|
|
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
6 |
|
1 |
(c) Price Controls |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
1 |
(d) Entry Into Business |
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
10.0 |
|
1 |
(e) Legal System |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
7.5 |
|
1 |
(f) Avoidance of Neg. Interest Rates |
|
|
- |
|
- |
|
10 |
|
8 |
|
10 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. Takings |
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
4.7 |
|
7.0 |
|
7.4 |
|
7.9 |
|
27.2 |
(a) Transfers and Subsidies (% of GDP) |
|
5 |
(6.6) |
5 |
(6.5) |
6 |
(5.2) |
7 |
(4.2) |
7 |
(4.4) |
1 |
(b) Marginal Tax Rates (Top Rate) |
|
|
- |
|
3 |
(50) |
7 |
(35) |
7 |
(35) |
8 |
(30) |
1 |
(c) Conscription |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. International Sector |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
2.2 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.9 |
|
6.9 |
|
22.5 |
(a) Taxes on International Trade (Avg.) |
|
4 |
(7.1) |
1 |
(9.6) |
1 |
(9.6) |
3 |
(7.6) |
4 |
(6.3) |
1 |
(b) Black Market Exchange Rates (Prem.) |
|
2 |
(47) |
2 |
(40) |
8 |
(1) |
5 |
(8) |
10 |
(0) |
1 |
(c) Size of Trade Sector (% of GDP) |
|
|
5 |
(56.1) |
5 |
(56.3) |
5 |
(54.5) |
7 |
(71.1) |
5 |
(61.0) |
1 |
(d) Capital Transactions with Foreigners |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
8 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Freedom Rating |
|
|
3.9 |
|
3.9 |
|
6.0 |
|
5.5 |
|
7.6 |
|
|
Ranking of Country |
|
|
|
55 |
|
52 |
|
15 |
|
31 |
|
5 |
|
|
Part 2: Recent Economic Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population 1996: |
1.2 |
|
Real Per Capita GDP |
: |
1995= |
$9,596 |
|
(in millions) |
|
|
(in 1995 U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
Annual Rate of Change (1985-96): |
1.0% |
|
|
Avg. Growth Rate: |
|
1980-90 = |
5.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1990-95 = |
4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Indicators:* |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
Change in Real GDP:Aggregate |
6.8 |
4.6 |
7.2 |
4.1 |
6.2 |
5.4 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
- |
: Per Capita |
5.8 |
3.6 |
6.2 |
3.1 |
5.2 |
4.4 |
2.1 |
3.4 |
- |
Inflation Rate (CPI) |
9.2 |
12.7 |
13.5 |
7.0 |
4.6 |
10.5 |
7.3 |
6.0 |
- |
Change in Money Supply: (M1) |
15.6 |
18.1 |
23.7 |
19.7 |
8.0 |
3.0 |
19.4 |
8.0 |
- |
: (M2) |
28.7 |
15.4 |
21.2 |
21.9 |
15.9 |
17.0 |
12.3 |
18.7 |
- |
Investment/GDP Ratio |
30.6 |
30.7 |
30.4 |
28.0 |
29.4 |
30.8 |
32.2 |
25.4 |
- |
Size of Trade Sector (% of GDP) |
69.3 |
70.3 |
71.1 |
67.3 |
64.2 |
65.4 |
61.6 |
61.0 |
- |
Total Gov't Exp./GDP Ratio |
22.9 |
23.2 |
25.3 |
23.2 |
23.2 |
21.5 |
22.6 |
23.2 |
- |
Central Government Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit (-) or Surplus (+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percent of GDP |
+0.3 |
-1.6 |
-0.5 |
0.0 |
-0.8 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
-1.4 |
- |
Unemployment Rate |
10.4 |
6.7 |
4.6 |
3.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The figures in this table are in percent form. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This small island nation has taken substantial steps toward economic
freedom since 1980. Surprisingly, our index now ranks it as the 5th freest economy in the
world, behind only Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, and the United States. This is
certainly a dramatic improvement over its 52nd place ranking in 1980, and 31st in 1990.
The figures on government expenditures also suggest increased reliance on markets. As a
share of GDP, total government expenditures summed to 23% in 1995, down from 27% in 1980
and 1985.
What accounts for this relatively high ranking? In the 1990s, the
growth rate of the money supply has been moderate and the inflation rate relatively
stable. The government consumption and transfer sectors are both relatively small and the
legal structure provides for protection of property rights and freedom of entry into
business. Taxes are moderate. Unlike most other countries, Mauritius rates average or well
above average for every component of our index. Its lowest rating in 1995 was a
"4" for the price controls component.
The following factors have contributed to the recent jump in rating:
- A more stable monetary policy (note the rating for each of the two
monetary policy components rose from 1 in 1975 to 9 in 1995;
- The recent deregulations allowing citizens to maintain foreign
currency bank accounts;
- Reductions in marginal tax ratesthe top marginal rate was
reduced from 50% in 1980 to 35% in 1985 and 30% in 1995;
- Elimination of exchange rate controls;
- A modest reduction in tariffs;
- Removal of restrictions on both the inflow and outflow of capital as
well as several regulations that were discriminatory toward foreign capital.
Like its economic freedom rating, Mauritiuss growth rate has
been impressive. Per capita GDP expanded at an annual rate of 5.2% during the 1980s and
4.1% thus far during the 1990s. If it continues on its current path, the economic future
of this country will be bright.