|
Introduction More than a decade ago, Michael Walker, the Executive Director of The Fraser Institute in Vancouver, Canada, and Nobel laureate Milton Friedman organized a series of conferences with the objective of clearly defining and measuring economic freedom. They were able to attract some of the world's leading economists including Gary Becker, Douglass North, Peter Bauer, and Assar Lindbeck to participate in the series and provide input for the study. These conferences eventually led to the publishing of Economic Freedom of the World: 1975-1995 (written by James Gwartney, Robert Lawson, and Walter Block) and the organizing of the Economic Freedom Network, a group of institutes in some 50 different countries seeking to develop the best possible measure of economic freedom. [See Michael Walker, ed., Freedom, Democracy, and Economic Welfare, (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1988); Walter Block, ed., Economic Freedom: Toward a Theory of Measurement, (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1991); Stephen Easton and Michael Walker, eds., Rating Global Economic Freedom, (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1992); James Gwartney, Robert Lawson and Walter Block, Economic Freedom of the World: 1975-1995, (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1996); and James Gwartney and Robert Lawson, Economic Freedom of the World, 1997 Report, (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1997). These publications provide the foundation for this work.] In his foreword to Economic Freedom of the World: 1975-1995, Milton Friedman indicated that the indexes presented in that publication had brought the quest for an objective measure of economic freedom to a "temporary conclusion." Amplifying this statement, Professor Friedman indicated subsequent studies would "surely make revised editions necessary, both to bring the indexes of economic freedom up-to-date and to incorporate the additional understanding that will be generated." The measures developed in this publication are indicative of this evolutionary process. They reflect improved knowledge about how to measure economic freedom and the development of a more complete data set for the achievement of that purpose. They represent movement to a new level. The core ingredients of economic freedom are personal choice, protection of private property, and freedom of exchange. Individuals have economic freedom when: (a) property acquired without the use of force, fraud, or theft is protected from physical invasions by others and (b) such property can be freely used, exchanged, or given to another as long as the owner's actions do not violate the identical rights of others. Like a compass, this concept of economic freedom has directed our work. From the very beginning, our goal was the development of an objective measure of economic freedom rather than an index based on subjective assessments and "judgment calls." Therefore, the foundation of our index is objective components that reflect the presence (or absence) of economic freedom--components that can be derived for a large number of countries from regularly published sources. This will make it possible both to calculate the index for earlier time periods and to update it regularly. We also wanted to combine the components into a summary index in a sound, objective manner. The measures presented in this report are an additional step in this direction. They are more comprehensive, based on more complete data and the use of statistical procedures more value-free, than any prior measure of economic freedom. Still, they are transparent. It is easy to see precisely how the various indexes are constructed, the data they reflect, and the factors underlying rating differences across countries and time periods. Exhibit 1: Components of the Index of Economic Freedom (7 areas/25 factors)
|