![[Search]](/img/navbar/searchoff.gif)
![[Media Releases]](/img/navbar/mediaoff.gif)
![[Events]](/img/navbar/eventsoff.gif)
![[Online Publications]](/img/navbar/onlineoff.gif)
![[Order Publications]](/img/navbar/orderoff.gif)
![[Student]](/img/navbar/studentoff.gif)
![[Radio]](/img/navbar/radiooff.gif)
![[National Media Archive]](/img/navbar/archiveoff.gif)
![[Membership]](/img/navbar/membershipoff.gif)
![[Other Resources]](/img/navbar/resourcesoff.gif)
![[About Us]](/img/navbar/aboutoff.gif)

The Economic Freedom Network
|
|
Economic Freedom of The World 2000
Economic Freedom and Social Welfare
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
Economists have been criticized, perhaps justifiably, for considering only the material side of
things. This section presents some simple charts
that relate the economic freedom ratings to nonmonetary aspects of human well-being. Exhibit 6
shows the relationship between the five economic freedom quintiles and cereal production
per hectare. Again we see a clear positive relationship. Exhibit 7 looks at life expectancy,
which is, in many ways, a summary statistic of the
overall well-being of a group of people. Exhibit 7
shows the strong positive correlation between
economic freedom and life expectancy. People
living in the top economic-freedom quintile live
20 years longer, on average, than do those living
in the bottom quintile. It should also be noted
that these are not the only social statistics that are
positively correlated with economic freedom.
Other work has looked at infant mortality, literacy,
access to safe drinking water, and corruption,
all of which show better outcomes with
higher levels of economic freedom.5

Without question, the most persistent criticism of
the market economy is its supposed failure to
achieve a “fair” distribution of income. Although
the question of what a “fair” distribution of income
actually means is not simple to answer, many people
find apparent income inequality disturbing.
The empirical question, however, is this: Do market-
oriented economies actually show a more unequal
distribution of income than other types of
economies? Exhibit 8 is an attempt to answer that
question. This exhibit shows the economic freedom
quintiles related to a measure of income inequality.
The measure used is the ratio of the
income of the top 10 percent (decile) of income
earners to the bottom 10 percent. A ratio of 1, for
instance, would indicate perfect equality, as the
top and bottom deciles would have the same
amount of income. The further this ratio moves
away from 1, the more unequal the distribution of
income. Exhibit 8 clearly shows that the distribution
of income is not closely related to economic
freedom. It appears that non-market (i.e., less economically
free) countries have a distribution of income
just as unequal as the market-oriented
nations or, in some cases, even more unequal. If
anything, it seems that market-oriented economies
have slightly more equal distributions of income.
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
| |
|
|
|
Last Modified: Monday, January 10, 2000
|
|