
![[Search]](/img/navbar/searchoff.gif)
![[Media Releases]](/img/navbar/mediaoff.gif)
![[Events]](/img/navbar/eventsoff.gif)
![[Online Publications]](/img/navbar/onlineoff.gif)
![[Order Publications]](/img/navbar/orderoff.gif)
![[Student]](/img/navbar/studentoff.gif)
![[Radio]](/img/navbar/radiooff.gif)
![[National Media Archive]](/img/navbar/archiveoff.gif)
![[Membership]](/img/navbar/membershipoff.gif)
![[Other Resources]](/img/navbar/resourcesoff.gif)
![[About Us]](/img/navbar/aboutoff.gif)

The Economic Freedom Network
|
|

Volume 9, Number 4
December 2000
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
Question of the Month
Q:
Why are Canadians so preoccupied with tax cuts, when our tax rates fall
squarely in the middle of the G7 countries, but our decline in social spending
has been far higher (even though our 1997 deficit was far lower)?
—Cat Ashton, York University,
Toronto, Ontario
A:
I do not agree that Canadians are preoccupied with tax cuts. Rather,
they are simply aware of the large tax burden that they bear and want it
reduced. In 1961, taxes accounted for 33.5 percent of the average family's
cash income. In 1981, they accounted for 40.8 percent, and in 2000, 47.5
of the average family's cash income went to pay taxes.
It is much more important to compare Canadian taxes and spending with those
of the United States, since 86 percent of our trade, which accounts for
over one third of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is with the United
States. Also, the fact that some other countries tax and spend more than
Canada says nothing about how useful this spending is. Research from the
World Bank shows that, among industrialized countries, those with small
governments perform just as well as those with medium-sized or large governments
on social indicators such as life expectancy, literacy, secondary school
enrolment, and infant mortality. Further, countries with small governments
have better performance on economic indicators such as real GDP growth,
the unemployment rate, and the number of patents per 10,000 population.
The United States is a good example. For the last 30 years, US governments
have taxed and spent less of their GDP than have Canadian governments.
In 1997, total tax revenues as a percent of GDP were 23.9 percent lower
in the US than in Canada. What is surprising is that American governments
are now able to spend more per capita than Canadian governments on goods
and services. In 1999, per capita US government spending (net of debt service
costs) was $168 CDN higher than per capita spending (net of debt service
costs) by Canadian governments. This remarkable fact results from the interaction
of the lower tax regime and higher standard of living in the US. Simply
put, Americans have more money than we do, and American governments can
provide the same level of spending with low tax rates that Canadian governments
do with relatively high tax rates.
Canadians' desire for tax relief is not a mystery when one considers the
increase in taxes in recent decades and the economic drag of a large government
sector.
—Joel Emes, Senior Research Economist, The Fraser Institute
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
|