
![[Search]](/img/navbar/searchoff.gif)
![[Media Releases]](/img/navbar/mediaoff.gif)
![[Events]](/img/navbar/eventsoff.gif)
![[Online Publications]](/img/navbar/onlineoff.gif)
![[Order Publications]](/img/navbar/orderoff.gif)
![[Student]](/img/navbar/studentoff.gif)
![[Radio]](/img/navbar/radiooff.gif)
![[National Media Archive]](/img/navbar/archiveoff.gif)
![[Membership]](/img/navbar/membershipoff.gif)
![[Other Resources]](/img/navbar/resourcesoff.gif)
![[About Us]](/img/navbar/aboutoff.gif)

The Economic Freedom Network
|
|

Volume 9, Number 4
December 2000
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
Centre for Studies in Risk and Regulation
In November 2000, The Fraser Institute launched a new Centre for Studies
in Risk and Regulation. The Centre's goal is to research the science and
economics behind risk controversies in order to inform Canadians about
the costs of regulations intended to protect human health and the environment.
"The costs, economic and otherwise, of particular policies intended to
reduce risks, are not given proper consideration in the policy-making process,
resulting in the danger that these well-intentioned policies might actually
reduce public well-being. The Centre for Studies in Risk and Regulation
will attempt to redress this balance by focusing on sound science and considering
the costs, as well as the benefits, of the policies intended to protect
Canadians," says Laura Jones, director of the new Centre.
As income and living standards have increased, tolerance for the risks
associated with everyday life has decreased. "Concern over smaller and
smaller risks in society, both real and imagined, has led us to demand
more regulation without taking into account its real impact" says Jones.
"Regulations to address one threat often inadvertently introduce other,
more serious threats."
In other cases, expenditure to reduce a risk could save more years of life
if spent reducing other risks. For example, an increasing amount of government
regulation in Canada is devoted to reducing risks associated with transportation.
However, according to Statistics Canada, 40 women die in commercial air
travel accidents annually. By contrast, 5,000 women die each year of breast
cancer.
A one percent reduction in the deaths due to breast cancer will save more
lives than a 100 percent reduction in deaths due to air travel. If some
of the resources currently spent to reduce the risk of air travel were
instead devoted to breast cancer reduction, we would likely save more lives.
"Governments are not regulating risk rationally, in part because they are
responding to the agendas of interest groups, which are reinforced by media
coverage" explains Jones.
The Centre plans a series of publications on current risk controversies,
including a guide to the science of global warming, a primer on the science
and economics of genetically modified foods, and a booklet of environmental
indicators. The Centre for Studies in Risk and Regulation will also publish
a major study on the cost of regulatory compliance.
"Many Canadians are not aware that regulatory compliance inflates the prices
of the goods and services that they buy. In fact, regulation is estimated
to cost every family of four over $11,000 annually. This is only slightly
lower than the income tax of $11,247 paid by a family of four with a $50,000
income," says Jones.
The Centre's first book, Safe Enough? Managing Risk and Regulation, argues
that governments can save more lives by regulating smarter and that in
some cases, regulations to address one threat can actually introduce other,
more serious threats. The book, with contributions from noted public policy
analysts and economists, focuses on the importance of basing decisions
about risk regulation on sound science and economics.
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
|