![[Search]](/img/navbar/searchoff.gif)
![[Media Releases]](/img/navbar/mediaoff.gif)
![[Events]](/img/navbar/eventsoff.gif)
![[Online Publications]](/img/navbar/onlineoff.gif)
![[Order Publications]](/img/navbar/orderoff.gif)
![[Student]](/img/navbar/studentoff.gif)
![[Radio]](/img/navbar/radiooff.gif)
![[National Media Archive]](/img/navbar/archiveoff.gif)
![[Membership]](/img/navbar/membershipoff.gif)
![[Other Resources]](/img/navbar/resourcesoff.gif)
![[About Us]](/img/navbar/aboutoff.gif)

The Economic Freedom Network
|
|

Contents
APRIL 1994
Editor's notes
April's solution: a real alternative to the GST
Media Archive invited to assist
in monitoring South African election
Taking the pledge
Power to the people
An eye on the prize
Is Canadian health care a good model for others to
follow?-- part II
Letters
April graph
April Table
States of confusion
Feature Article
April's Solution: a real alternative to the GST
by Michael Walker
LATER THIS MONTH, THE Institute is hosting a significant two-day
conference in Vancouver. Called "The Impact of the Underground Economy," its
goal is to attempt to measure and quantify the size and scope of this segment of Canada's
economy. On the first day, experts from Canada and around the world will look at what
sectors make up the underground economy, how much of it involves contraband goods, and how
other countries cope with similar situations.
On the second day, part of the discussion will centre on the impact that
the underground economy has on government revenues, and questions whether we as Canadians
have reached our taxation limit. One of the papers will suggest that the government
implement more designated taxes as a way of coping with taxpayer resistance.
People interested in this conference will also want to read Michael
Walker's feature article in this month's issue of Fraser Forum, "April's
solution: an real alternative to the GST." It proposes a form of taxation that is
applied only to individual spending (while excluding savings). The proposed tax is easier
to administer than the GST, and, most importantly, lowers the taxation rate from the GST's
present 7 percent. Michael Walker's proposal is of direct relevance to the underground
economy question because with a lower tax rate, fewer people will find it in their
interest to evade the tax. Fewer people avoiding the tax could, in turn, increase the
government's take and help deal with the persistent deficit problem.
Please think about joining us for this critical and timely conference.
Call us at (604) 688-0221 ext. 310 or (416) 363-6575 ext. 310 to find out more.
April's solution: a real alternative to the GST
Michael Walker
This paper is a summary of invited evidence presented to the
Standing Committee on Finance of the Parliament of Canada on March 1st and 9th, 1994,
Ottawa, Ontario.-Note.
Introduction
THE FRASER INSTITUTE DID not oppose the installation of the Goods and
Services Tax. It was, in our opinion, a superior alternative to the Manufacturers Sales
Tax which it replaced. However, our support for the GST was conditional on it being
absorbed into a general sales tax which would include the provincial sales tax, the base
of which would have been harmonized with the federal sales tax. We also suggested that a
tax limitation clause be included within the legislation for the GST, requiring a separate
special Parliamentary debate before its rate could be increased. While neither of these
conditions was really met, the GST is now in place, and rather than not support it
because of the failure to meet these two conditions, we feel that less damage would be
done by leaving the tax in place than by removing it because of these deficiencies.
Of course, one possible approach would be to indeed persuade the provinces
to merge the GST and the PST into a National Sales Tax. Such a tax would have to be a
value-added tax, like the GST, so as to avoid the taxation of productive inputs and to
exempt exports. This National Sales Tax would eliminate the necessity of collecting PST
and all of the costs associated with it. The federal government would carry the political
burden of the tax, and the provincial governments would gain revenue from the broader base
for the NST.
The transparency of such a replacement would probably make it politically
unacceptable. In the remainder of this paper, we therefore propose a real alternative to
the GST that would be more than cosmetically different from it.
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
| |
|
|
|
Last Modified: Wednesday, October 20, 1999.
|
|