![[Search]](/img/navbar/searchoff.gif)
![[Media Releases]](/img/navbar/mediaoff.gif)
![[Events]](/img/navbar/eventsoff.gif)
![[Online Publications]](/img/navbar/onlineoff.gif)
![[Order Publications]](/img/navbar/orderoff.gif)
![[Student]](/img/navbar/studentoff.gif)
![[Radio]](/img/navbar/radiooff.gif)
![[National Media Archive]](/img/navbar/archiveoff.gif)
![[Membership]](/img/navbar/membershipoff.gif)
![[Other Resources]](/img/navbar/resourcesoff.gif)
![[About Us]](/img/navbar/aboutoff.gif)

The Economic Freedom Network
|
|

Contents
MARCH 1994
Editor's notes
Charting the structural economic effects of the
deficit and the debt
Laurels
Robot dreams
Requiem for a nobody
Is Canadian health care a good model for others to
follow?--part I
Three myths about corporations
and taxes
Will Mr. Martin's budget be successful?
March graph
To revolt or not to revolt
The health of a nation and its
wealth are directly linked
The federal debt in perspective
Letters
Feature Article
Charting the Structural Economic Effects of the Deficit and the Debt
by
Robert Crozier
POLLS CONSISTENTLY SHOW that one primary concern of Canadians in the
mid-1990s is the country's debt and deficit. This concern varies in intensity across the
nation, but the topic did form a considerable part of the discussion in the recent federal
election and in the consultations Finance Minister Paul Martin had with Canadian
economists prior to his late February budget.
Certainly the issue is one that has absorbed the attention of Institute
economists and policy analysts for years. These people have consistently predicted, over
and over, in an endless variety of ways, that not only do Canada's debt bugbears exist,
but the deficit and resulting ever-building debt absolutely must be dealt with, and dealt
with now. In a way that is both satisfying (because our calculations are right) but
unfortunate (for the same reason), we can see our predictions coming horribly true.
Canadians are burdened by such a weight of interest payments and such a corresponding
weight of taxation that the economic recovery which has taken hold in the United States
seems to be at best manifesting itself only weakly here.
As we are all too aware, each year, despite the Institute's best efforts,
and despite the increasing calls from Canadians to tackle the crisis, the government makes
the problem worse by spending more than it can afford. (Paul Martin's recent budget may be
a case in point, as Michael Walker points out in his article in this issue, "Will Mr.
Martin's budget be successful?")
In an attempt to bring home the urgency of Canada's current economic
situation, this issue of Fraser Forum examines the debt and deficit again, this
time from the perspective of someone who has looked at the cold, hard numbers daily for
much of his working life. Robert Crozier, now retired from Statistics Canada, details
clearly and succinctly how bad the debt and deficit problem is in this country, and why it
is so urgent that we act now to save the nation from economic disaster.
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
| |
|
|
|
Last Modified: Wednesday, October 20, 1999.
|
|