|
Editors NotesAs many long-term readers may remember, Fraser Forum has evolved considerably over the years. When I joined the Institute in January 1991, Fraser Forum was a small pocket-sized pamphlet, bound in a coloured construction-paper type cover, consisting mainly of written versions of Michael Walkers radio commentaries. It moved on to include articles by other Institute authors, particularly Walter Block and Sally Pipes, and covered many more topics than those addressed on the executive directors radio program. In June 1991, the magazine changed its look, but kept its size. We updated the font, made the layout easier to follow, standardized the cover design, and added some new authors. The next big change came in
1994 when we decided to go to the larger, 8½ x 11 inch format. The new size let us show
more and bigger tables and charts to illustrate the original research we were presenting.
Our circle of authors continued to expand and the topics they covered ranged from labour
issues to health care to the environment to justice to Canadian unity to the debt and
deficit, to name just a few. The Critical Now it is time to make a few more changes. Over the years, some readers have suggested that we spice up the magazine by adding some graphics and updating our presentation of charts and tabular material. Youve also asked that we make the cover more appealing and tell you a bit more about our authors. For our part, we want to ensure that you receive the same quality research weve tried to provide for years, and the same incisive editorials youve come to expect. We think this new format goes a long way towards achieving these goals. We hope you enjoy our new look. Let us know what you think. Kristin McCahon
|