Fraser Institute Logo

Search
Media Releases
Events
Online Publications
Order Publications
Student
Radio
National Media Archive
Membership
Other Resources
Employment
About Us

Spinning World Icon
The
Economic Freedom
Network

 

Fraser Forum

December 2000 Fraser Forum:
Canadian & American Monetary Generosity1

[Previous] [Contents] [Next]

Jason Clemens& Johanna Francis

The charitable sector2 is a vital part of Canadian society. It is a unique sector, separate from the government and for-profit business sectors. It provides a wide range of goods and services that would often not otherwise be available. It acts as a conduit through which citizens can connect with each other, and affect the landscape of their communities. Given its importance in society, it is critical that we continue to deepen our understanding of the sector.

To this end, The Fraser Institute has completed a number of studies looking at the charitable sector. This is the third year in which we have completed research in the area of charitable giving. In previous years, we have evaluated generosity using both monetary indicators and volunteering. Unfortunately, current data for volunteering in Canada is not available.3 The 2000 study, therefore, focuses exclusively on financial generosity.


Results for Canada and the US

Table 1 contains the results and rankings for three variables: (1) the percentage of taxpayers who donate to registered charities, (2) the percentage of income donated to registered charities, and (3) the average charitable donation.


Percentage of taxpayers making donations

The first of the three variables is the percentage of taxpayers who donate to registered charities. It measures the extent or breadth of monetary generosity.

There appears to be very little differentiation between Canadians and Americans in terms of the percentage of each who donate to charities: 26.6 percent of American taxpayers donated to charities while 26.4 percent of Canadian taxpayers did the same.4

As in previous years, Maryland had the highest proportion of taxpayers making charitable donations (40.1 percent) for both the US and Canada. New Jersey donated the next highest percentage (36.9 percent). South Dakota, on the other hand, recorded the lowest percentage of taxpayers making charitable donations (11.9 percent).

The top Canadian province for this variable was Manitoba, where 30.6 percent of taxpayers donated to registered charities, 9.5 percentage points lower than Maryland. Ontario and Saskatchewan followed closely with 28.9 percent and 28.6 percent, respectively. Newfoundland recorded the lowest percentage of taxpayers making charitable donations in Canada (22.4 percent), but 10.5 percentage points higher than South Dakota.

The range among Canadian provinces in terms of the percentage of taxpayers who made charitable donations (8.2 percentage points) was markedly narrower than the range recorded in the US (28.2 percentage points).

Although there was a substantial difference between the top US state and the top Canadian province—Manitoba ranked 14th overall—the overall distribution of rankings suggests a relatively positive performance for the Canadian provinces. Four of the ten provinces ranked in the second quintile5 and three in both the third and fourth quintile. No Canadian province ranked in either the top or the bottom quintile for this variable.


A worrisome Canadian trend

By and large, the US experienced an across-the-board increase in the number of taxpayers who donated to charities from the previous year. Arkansas led the US states with a 3.9 percent growth rate in the percentage of donors relative to taxpayers between 1996 and 1997. A host of states, including Alaska, the District of Columbia, Indiana, and New Mexico registered similar growth rates. New York was the only state that recorded a contraction in the percentage of taxpayers making donations, albeit a small one of 0.2 percent. In total, the US experienced an increase of 2.1 percent in the percentage of taxpayers donating to charities.

Canada, on the other hand, continued its own worrisome trend in which the proportion of taxpayers donating to charities is continuing to decline. Between 1996 and 1997, the provinces experienced an average decline of 4.9 percent in the percentage of taxpayers making donations, ranging from a decrease of 1.0 percent in BC to 9.8 percent in Quebec. This trend of a declining proportion of taxpayers supporting charities has been relatively constant throughout the 1990s. For example, between 1990 and 1997, the provinces experienced an average 13.8 percent decline in the percentage of taxpayers making charitable contributions, ranging from a decline of 7.1 percent in Newfoundland to 20.1 percent in Nova Scotia.

Percent of income donated to charities

The second measure of monetary generosity is the total percentage of income donated to registered charities in each state or province. Income measures in each jurisdiction were adjusted to reflect after-tax income since it is impossible to donate monies already taken in tax.6 Table 1 contains the results and rankings of both the Canadian provinces and US states.

Table 1: Results & Rank for Charitable Contributions—Canada & US

 

# of Donors

Rank

% of Income

Rank

Avg. Donation

Rank

Alabama

22.9%

45

3.51%

5

3,643

9

Alaska

17.9%

53

2.02%

48

2,731

29

Arizona

28.6%

20

2.82%

24

2,547

39

Arkansas

17.9%

52

3.18%

12

3,826

8

California

31.0%

12

3.00%

16

2,831

26

Colorado

31.0%

11

2.92%

19

2,708

32

Connecticut

35.8%

3

2.81%

26

2,831

25

Delaware

31.8%

8

2.91%

20

2,653

34

District of Columbia

31.6%

9

4.77%

2

4,425

4

Florida

21.2%

50

2.93%

18

3,633

10

Georgia

28.5%

22

3.57%

4

3,333

13

Hawaii

29.1%

17

2.52%

38

2,162

47

Idaho

25.9%

30

3.45%

8

3,063

18

Illinois

27.5%

25

2.64%

31

2,839

24

Indiana

22.1%

49

2.52%

39

2,904

20

Iowa

23.5%

41

2.47%

41

2,503

40

Kansas

23.9%

39

2.87%

22

3,136

17

Kentucky

23.3%

42

2.65%

29

2,631

36

Louisiana

14.9%

57

2.24%

45

3,509

11

Maine

24.2%

38

2.20%

46

2,040

49

Maryland

40.1%

1

3.51%

6

2,721

30

Massachusetts

33.3%

6

2.61%

33

2,495

41

Michigan

28.8%

19

2.81%

25

2,687

33

Minnesota

34.3%

4

3.13%

13

2,485

42

Mississippi

16.0%

55

3.02%

14

3,870

7

Missouri

22.7%

47

2.63%

32

2,899

21

Montana

23.3%

43

2.65%

30

2,303

45

Nebraska

23.0%

44

2.90%

21

3,011

19

Nevada

26.0%

29

2.57%

35

2,777

28

New Hampshire

27.9%

24

1.86%

50

1,982

51

New Jersey

36.9%

2

2.75%

27

2,461

43

New Mexico

19.3%

51

2.38%

44

2,613

37

New York

34.0%

5

3.73%

3

3,292

14

North Carolina

26.5%

27

3.31%

11

3,148

16

North Dakota

14.7%

58

1.91%

49

2,714

31

Ohio

25.1%

33

2.50%

40

2,451

44

Oklahoma

22.9%

46

3.37%

10

3,345

12

Oregon

30.2%

15

2.96%

17

2,563

38

Pennsylvania

25.7%

31

2.56%

36

2,644

35

Rhode Island

31.2%

10

2.38%

43

1,993

50

South Carolina

24.4%

35

3.40%

9

3,226

15

South Dakota

11.9%

61

2.46%

42

4,541

3

Tennessee

16.4%

54

2.84%

23

4,342

5

Texas

15.7%

56

2.54%

37

4,246

6

Utah

33.0%

7

6.80%

1

5,266

2

Vermont

24.5%

34

2.16%

47

2,061

48

Virginia

30.7%

13

3.02%

15

2,824

27

Washington

26.8%

26

2.73%

28

2,867

23

West Virginia

12.2%

60

1.62%

51

2,874

22

Wisconsin

29.6%

16

2.58%

34

2,199

46

Wyoming

14.1%

59

3.49%

7

6,247

1

United States

26.6%

 

2.91%

 

2,967

 

British Columbia

24.3%

36

1.25%

55

1033

53

Alberta

26.3%

28

0.98%

60

1037

52

Saskatchewan

28.6%

21

1.32%

54

915

55

Manitoba

30.6%

14

1.46%

52

882

56

Ontario

28.9%

18

1.21%

57

944

54

Quebec

23.7%

40

0.58%

61

400

61

New Brunswick

24.3%

37

1.24%

56

818

57

Nova Scotia

25.4%

32

1.17%

58

719

58

Prince Edward Is.

28.3%

23

1.36%

53

697

59

Newfoundland

22.4%

48

1.14%

59

690

60

Canada

26.4%

 

1.07%

 

822

 

Sources: IRS Statistics of Income Bulletin, Spring 1999. Prepared by the Center on Nonprofits & Philanthropy at the Urban Institute; Revenue Canada, Tax Statistics on Individuals, (1997 Tax Year), Interim Statistics, 1999.

Unlike the previous measure of monetary generosity, with this measure there is a considerable difference between the aggregate performance of the two countries. Americans allotted 2.9 percent of income to charities in 1997 while Canadians donated 1.1 percent. Again, there is considerable variance between the Canadian provinces and US states.

Utah tops the list of jurisdictions with 6.8 percent of its income, adjusted for taxes, donated to charities. There is a considerable gap between Utah and the next two states: District of Columbia (4.8 percent) and New York (3.7 percent). West Virginia recorded the lowest percentage of income donated to charities (1.6 percent) for US states.

The Canadian provinces record a rather poor showing in this measure of monetary generosity. The top-ranked Canadian province was Manitoba, whose citizens donated 1.5 percent of their income to charities. Manitoba’s overall rank was 52nd. Utah, the top-ranked US state, allocated 4.5 times more income to charities than Manitoba.

In fact, every Canadian province ranked in the bottom quintile in terms of the percentage of income donated to charities. Worse still, Quebec, the lowest-ranked Canadian province with a mere 0.6 percent of income donated to charities, also achieved the dubious honour of recording the absolute lowest rank of any US state or Canadian province.

Like the previous measure of monetary generosity, the range among Canadian provinces in terms of income donated to charities (0.9 percentage points) was markedly smaller than the range recorded in the US (5.2 percentage points).

Positive trend

A seemingly contradictory trend continues to emerge in Canada wherein fewer people, as a percentage of taxpayers, are giving more money. That is, while the proportion of taxpayers who donate to charities is declining in Canada, the percentage of income they donate has consistently increased. Between 1996 and 1997, Manitoba experienced the largest increase (13.7 percent) in the percentage of income donated to charities, compared to a provincial average increase of 9.2 percent.

More startling are the increases recorded since 1990. On average, the provinces gave 21.0 percent more to charities as a percentage of income—led by British Columbia with a 36.0 percent increase.7

The US states experienced significantly larger increases than did the Canadian provinces, partly because the percentage of US taxpayers donating to charities is increasing rather than decreasing as is the case in Canada. On average, the percentage of income donated by the US states increased 56.3 percent between 1996 and 1997.

The value of charitable donations

We also looked at the average charitable donation made in each jurisdiction. The calculation used to determine the average donation is different than the one used to determine the percentage of income donated, so the two are not readily comparable.

The results for the average donation mirror those garnered from the 1999 study. As in previous years, Alberta maintains the highest average charitable donation in Canada of Cdn $1,037, while Quebec records the lowest average donation of Cdn $400.

Similarly, citizens of Wyoming again give the highest average charitable donation in the US of US $6,247. The lowest-ranking US state, New Hampshire, records an average donation of US $1,982.

Once more, the Canadian provinces rank dead last, without exception, in terms of the average dollar value of charitable donations when compared with US states. Alberta, the highest-ranking Canadian province only ranks 52nd when compared with the US states. Worse still, the dollar values presented in table 1 are NOT adjusted for differences in national currencies: US donations are shown in US dollars and Canadian donations are shown in Canadian dollars. If either the US or Canadian data were translated into a common currency using either Purchasing Power Parity or the actual exchange rate, the differences between the US and Canada would be substantially greater.


Canada-US Monetary Generosity Index

A different and more accessible way to understand the data in table 1 is to create an index. Table 2 contains the specific index scores for both the percentage of taxpayers who donate to registered charities and the percentage of income they donate, as well as an overall aggregate index score. This index gives a straightforward method to evaluate the monetary generosity of Canadian provinces and US states.

Table 2: Index Scores—Canada & US

 

State/Province

Index:
Donors as a % of Taxpayers

Index:
Donations a % of Income

Aggregate
Index
Score

1

Utah

8.2

10.0

9.1

2

Maryland

10.0

5.2

7.6

3

District of Columbia

7.9

7.0

7.4

4

New York

8.5

5.5

7.0

5

New Jersey

9.2

4.0

6.6

6

Minnesota

8.5

4.6

6.6

7

Connecticut

8.9

4.1

6.5

8

Georgia

7.1

5.2

6.2

9

Delaware

7.9

4.3

6.1

10

California

7.7

4.4

6.1

11

Massachusetts

8.3

3.8

6.1

12

Virginia

7.7

4.4

6.0

13

Colorado

7.7

4.3

6.0

14

Oregon

7.5

4.3

5.9

15

Idaho

6.5

5.1

5.8

16

North Carolina

6.6

4.9

5.7

17

Michigan

7.2

4.1

5.7

18

Rhode Island

7.8

3.5

5.6

19

Arizona

7.1

4.1

5.6

20

Wisconsin

7.4

3.8

5.6

21

South Carolina

6.1

5.0

5.5

22

Hawaii

7.3

3.7

5.5

23

Alabama

5.7

5.2

5.4

24

Illinois

6.9

3.9

5.4

25

Washington

6.7

4.0

5.3

26

Oklahoma

5.7

5.0

5.3

27

Nevada

6.5

3.8

5.1

28

Kansas

6.0

4.2

5.1

29

Pennsylvania

6.4

3.8

5.1

30

Nebraska

5.7

4.3

5.0

31

Ohio

6.2

3.7

5.0

32

Manitoba

7.6

2.1

4.9

33

Kentucky

5.8

3.9

4.9

34

Montana

5.8

3.9

4.8

35

New Hampshire

6.9

2.7

4.8

36

Florida

5.3

4.3

4.8

37

Missouri

5.7

3.9

4.8

38

Iowa

5.9

3.6

4.7

39

Vermont

6.1

3.2

4.6

40

Maine

6.0

3.2

4.6

41

Indiana

5.5

3.7

4.6

42

Arkansas

4.5

4.7

4.6

43

Saskatchewan

7.1

1.9

4.5

44

Prince Edward Island

7.0

2.0

4.5

45

Ontario

7.2

1.8

4.5

46

Wyoming

3.5

5.1

4.3

47

Mississippi

4.0

4.4

4.2

48

New Mexico

4.8

3.5

4.2

49

Tennessee

4.1

4.2

4.1

50

Nova Scotia

6.3

1.7

4.0

51

Alberta

6.6

1.4

4.0

52

British Columbia

6.1

1.8

3.9

53

New Brunswick

6.0

1.8

3.9

54

Texas

3.9

3.7

3.8

55

Alaska

4.5

3.0

3.7

56

Newfoundland

5.6

1.7

3.6

57

Louisiana

3.7

3.3

3.5

58

Quebec

5.9

0.9

3.4

59

South Dakota

3.0

3.6

3.3

60

North Dakota

3.7

2.8

3.2

61

West Virginia

3.1

2.4

2.7

Like the 1999 results, the index calculation that combines the percentage of taxpayers donating to charities and the percentage of income donated to charities reveals a large gap between the top-ranked jurisdiction and the remaining provinces and states. Utah, with a score of 9.1 out of 10, significantly outperforms the second-ranked jurisdiction, Maryland, with a score of 7.6.

Manitoba achieves the highest rank of any Canadian province at 32nd with a score of 4.9. Three provinces tie for the next highest Canadian score (4.5) and rank (43rd): Saskatchewan, PEI, and Ontario. Unsurprisingly, Quebec has the lowest score (3.4) and rank (58th) of any Canadian province. In terms of the distribution of rankings, 1 Canadian province is in the third quintile, 3 are in the fourth quintile, and 6 are in the bottom quintile. No Canadian province scored high enough to place in either of the top two quintiles.


Explaining the difference

Although a more rigorous, time-based analysis is required of the charitable giving and generosity data, it seems clear that there are a number of variables influencing the level of charitable giving. For instance, we know from a variety of sources that demographics influence charitable giving. The distribution of age, sex, and occupations as well as educational attainment seems to have a minor effect on charitable giving, although again, more rigorous analysis is required to draw any definitive conclusions.

Economic variables, such as average income levels, unemployment, size of government, and tax burdens also seem to affect the results to varying degrees. Once more, these preliminary inferences are not definitive conclusions, but rather observations requiring greater research.

Finally, it is interesting to note the trend, repeated again, of both western and "have" provinces performing fairly well, while eastern and "have-not" provinces perform relatively poorly. It is also interesting to compare the trend noticed this year—when volunteering was excluded—to that of previous years when volunteering was included. The trend remains: western and "have" provinces perform relatively better, although the trend is not as strong without the volunteer factor.


Conclusion

Generally, people agree that the role and importance of charities and non-profit organizations in society is growing. As a consequence, it is important for us to understand how these organizations function.

This study’s data corroborates other research that indicates a worrisome trend in Canada; a declining percentage of total taxpayers donate to charities. On the other hand, those who do donate are donating more. The data also reveal the considerable gap between US states and Canadian provinces in terms of the amount donated to registered charities. Why do we see such stark differences? Only further research will provide a firm explanation.


Notes

1This article was originally intended to be a formal study (released as a Public Policy Source). There is, therefore, a considerable amount of information and data not presented in the article but which is readily available upon request. Contact the authors by e-mail at jasonc@fraserinstitute.ca.

2All registered charities are non-profits, but not all non-profits are registered charities.
Registered charities are, therefore, a subset of the larger non-profit sector. Receiving charitable status allows agencies to issue tax-deductible receipts to donors and receive funding from registered foundations. It also places them under the purview of Revenue Canada. Conversely, non-profit organizations that do not receive charitable status are precluded from issuing tax receipts and receiving monies from foundations, but neither are they under the regulatory control of Revenue Canada.

3The Revenue Canada database, from which we extract data, has not been available for the past 2 years.

4Americans can file their income taxes as either itemized or non-itemized returns. Charitable contributions are only counted for those tax-filers submitting an itemized claim where specific deductions are made for charities. Thus, the number of Americans who actually donate to charities would be much higher if non-itemized returns were included.

5The Canadian provinces and US states were divided into 5 groups of equal size based on their performance in each of the variables. Each group is referred to as a quintile since each contains of the total number of jurisdictions.

6For a complete description and discussion of the methodology employed in making this adjustment, please see: 1999 Private Charitable Generosity Index, Public Policy Sources no. 34, available on the internet at www.fraserinstitute.ca/publications/pps/34/.

7The trend of fewer people (as a percentage of total taxpayers) donating more in Canada continues beyond the 1997 data presented here. According to Statistics Canada, apart from a small deviation in 1998, 0.05 percent fewer people (as a proportion of taxpayers) donated to charity in 1999 than in the previous year. However, the value of those donations, even after adjusting for inflation, increased by 2.7 percent.


References

Clemens, J. and D. Samida (1999). "1999 Private Charitable Generosity Index." Public Policy Source #34. Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute.

Fleenor, Patrick (1997). "Tax Freedom Day 1997 is May 9." No. 69. Washington, DC: Tax Foundation. April.

Internal Revenue Service (1999). IRS Statistics of Income Bulletin. Washington, DC. Spring.

Revenue Canada. Tax Statistics on Individuals. Ottawa, Ontario. Series: 1992, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1999.

Statistics Canada (1998). Caring Canadians, Involved Canadians: Highlights from the 1997 National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Cat. #71-542-XIE. August.

Tax Foundation (2000). Calculations of Tax Burden and Net-National Product. Supplied to authors. Washington, DC: Tax Foundation.

Urban Institute (2000). Profiles of Individual Charitable Contributions by State, 1997. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Urban Institute (2000). Analysis of data from IRS Statistics of Income Bulletin. Supplied to authors via fax. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.


Jason Clemens (jasonc@fraserinstitute.ca) is the Director of Fiscal Studies at The Fraser Institute. He has a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the University of Windsor.

Johanna Francis has worked as a researcher at The Fraser Institute. She has an M.A. in Economics from McGill University and is currently completing her Ph.D. in Economics at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

[Previous] [Contents] [Next]



E-Mail Icon
info@fraserinstitute.ca
4th Floor, 1770 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6J 3G7
Tel: (604) 688-0221 Fax: (604) 688-8539 Book Orders: 1-800-665-3558 ext. 580

You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.