|

December 2000 Fraser Forum: Economic Intelligence Briefs
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
compiled by Martin Zelder
Government Failure at the North Pole
Explorations for the purpose of scientific and geographical discovery,
such as space missions, might seem an example of an activity naturally
suited for government provision. Yet the history of exploration is marked
by both public and private endeavours. One focus of such expeditions in
the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, was the arctic, with scores
of explorations launched by countries throughout the world. Given the rich
historical data available on these endeavours, economist Jonathan Karpoff
decided to assess whether government-financed arctic expeditions had different
characteristics than privately-funded ones.
They did, and markedly so. For the 92 distinct arctic explorations during
the period 1818-1909, Karpoff analyzed whether the source of financing
influenced a variety of measurable outcomes. He found that publicly-funded
expeditions had significantly worse outcomes than privately-financed ones.
In particular, public expeditions had higher rates of crew deaths and of
ship losses, as well as more common incidence of scurvy. These shortcomings
arose despite the fact that public expeditions were more abundantly financed,
using more ships and larger crews. Moreover, there was no significant difference
in the rate of major discoveries by publicly- versus privately-funded explorers.
Because of this, the efficiency of private explorations—measured as the
rate of major discoveries relative to crew size—exceeded that for the public
ones.
The reason for the superiority of private arctic exploration, Karpoff found,
was superiority in incentives and organization. Specifically, while private
expeditions were actually led by their organizers in 78 percent of cases,
this was only true in 27 percent of government-funded endeavours. According
to Karpoff, "Because they did not actually go on the trips, the organizers
of public expeditions faced few of the negative consequences of poor planning
or erroneous theories," among which were misguided views on proper clothing,
scurvy prevention, optimal travel mode, and the existence of a fictitious,
ice-free "Open Polar Sea."
Source: Jonathan M. Karpoff, "Public Versus Private Initiative in Arctic
Exploration: The Effects of Incentives and Organizational Structure," Independent
Institute, Working Paper no. 23 (2000).
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]

info@fraserinstitute.ca
4th Floor, 1770 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6J 3G7
Tel: (604) 688-0221 Fax: (604) 688-8539 Book Orders: 1-800-665-3558 ext. 580
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|