![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
May 2001May Questions & Answers and May Graphby Joel Emes and Jason Clemens Q: How does British Columbia’s economic performance over the last decade compare to the other "have" provinces, Ontario and Alberta?
A: Ontario and Alberta both significantly outperformed British Columbia
on basic economic indicators in the 1990s. While Ontario and Alberta posted
respectable rates of growth in real per capita GDP, namely, 16.7 and 26.7
percent respectively over the decade, British Columbia lagged with a growth
rate in real per capita GDP of 2.1 percent (see table 1).
![]()
Q: From previous Fraser Forums, I know that British Columbians have a high tax burden and that government in BC spends a relatively large portion of GDP. However, doesn’t that higher tax burden and spending translate into an equally higher level of government services? A: Actually, no. Consolidated provincial/local spending as a percentage of GDP in BC is 21.7 percent higher than in Ontario. This higher level of spending and the high tax burden needed to pay for it result in BC spending only $208 (2.7%) more per person than Ontario. The comparison with Alberta is even more depressing for British Columbians. Although provincial and local governments in BC spend 28.2 percent more of GDP than do provincial and local governments in Alberta, government spending per person is $562 (7.0%) higher in Alberta than in BC. The reason? Alberta takes a smaller slice of a larger economic pie than BC does; this translates into more spending for Albertans.
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems. |