![[Search]](/img/navbar/searchoff.gif)
![[Media Releases]](/img/navbar/mediaoff.gif)
![[Events]](/img/navbar/eventsoff.gif)
![[Online Publications]](/img/navbar/onlineoff.gif)
![[Order Publications]](/img/navbar/orderoff.gif)
![[Student]](/img/navbar/studentoff.gif)
![[Radio]](/img/navbar/radiooff.gif)
![[National Media Archive]](/img/navbar/archiveoff.gif)
![[Membership]](/img/navbar/membershipoff.gif)
![[Other Resources]](/img/navbar/resourcesoff.gif)
![[About Us]](/img/navbar/aboutoff.gif)

The Economic Freedom Network
|
|

Volume 4, Number 3
Germany: Network Coverage During aYear of Change
For many, the opening of the East German borders and the fall of
the Berlin Wall signified the end of the cold war. Lloyd Robertson began the 9 November
1989 "CTV National News" with the announcement: "After twenty-eight years,
the East German government is throwing open its borders to the West, turning the Berlin
Wall into a relic of the cold war and possibly opening a whole new page in European
history." Similarly, Terrence McKenna opened the 15 November 1989 "Journal"
with: "The virtual destruction of the Berlin Wall is only the most dramatic symbol of
the changes that are rocking the communist world and promising to redraw the boundaries of
Europe. For the first time, people are talking seriously about the end of the cold war,
the end of a divided Germany, even the end of communism."
The events brought about swift change and the media were watching. In particular, they
were watching the evolution toward the unification of Germany. Almost immediately on
national television news there was discussion on the costs and benefits of unification.
Questions centred on the impact of changes on the political, economic, social, military
and international spheres.
Those interested in international politics and mass communication consistently remark that
the media has a significant role in forming public perceptions of international issues.1
They argue that the more distant the event is from our cultural and national boundaries,
the more likely we are to depend and rely upon the media to form opinions about those
issues. Given the role of the media in framing international issues, how did the Canadian
national news networks report unification?
This issue of On Balance will examine CBC and CTV national news coverage of Germany from
the opening of its borders to political unification (October 1, 1989 to October 3, 1990).
DEBATE ON UNIFICATION EMPHASIZED IN COVERAGE
The single most-discussed topic during the year of change was unification which comprised
over one-third of CBC and over one-quarter of CTV statements on Germany for the year.
Political Aspects of Unification Presented Favourably
Figure A shows the distribution of attention to unification on
political, economic, military, international and social issues. Of this coverage, the
impact on politics comprised over one
"... just the idea that they could
leave it if they want to has given them a whole new outlook on life."
fifth of CTV and almost one fifth of CBC
attention.
Click here to view Figure A: Coverage of Unification Issues
Over half of CBC and almost half of CTV attention to politics was neutral. Much of this
coverage focused on East Germans now being able to visit the West as a result of the
border openings, and East German reforms resulting from the political changes.
Of the political assessments, almost twice as many positive as negative statements were
made. For example, regarding East Germans travelling to the West, both networks provided 8
times as many positive statements as negative ones. One such instance occurred on 10
November 1989 when Lloyd Robertson introduced an ABC story by John Lawrence: "But
just the idea that they could leave it if they want to has given them a whole new outlook
on life." John Lawrence continued the theme by interviewing East Germans who crossed
over: "A father and son celebrating the unexpected freedom to travel to the other
side of the wall. The people are talking about how easy it is now to cross over to West
Berlin. 'You don't need a passport,' the woman says, 'only your identity card. It's
easy.'"
The coverage on political reforms was also substantially more positive than negative; 7 in
10 described the positive outcomes of the events. On 7 November 1989, for example, CTV's
Peter Murphy reported: "East Germany's communist rulers today made their biggest
political concession so far. They presented plans in parliament to share power with
non-communists in a new cabinet, and the parliament voted unanimously to approve
experiments in private enterprise and free elections."
Similarly, on 17 November 1989, Knowlton Nash reported on "The National":
"The country's Prime Minister, Hans Modrow, called the changes which have been taking
place irreversible, and he spoke of a Germany with greater possibility of
reunification." In that same story, reporter Paul Workman restated the positive
effect the changes were having on East Germany: "East Germany has now issued 10
million border passes. That's two-thirds of the entire population. Most are coming to
shop, only a few coming to stay. The government's reforms seem to be working. And today it
announced new reforms, changes that communist leader, Egon Krenz, called a
revolution."
CTV Provides More Negative Statements on Economics
Economic issues also comprised a significant proportion of network attention, at almost
one quarter of CBC and
Almost one third of network attention
examined what the future would be like if the two Germanies were to unite.
one fifth of CTV attention. While CBC provided
balanced arguments about the economics of unification, 7 out of 10 CTV statements
statements about the issue were negative.
For example, on 22 March 1990 "CTV National News," Roger Smith reported on the
economic problems surrounding the unification of the two Germanies: "Even with the
prospect of quick reunification, about 1500 East Germans are still leaving every day to
settle in the West. But the joyous reception for the first arrivals last summer has turned
sour as West Germans face the cost of reunification. This woman worries about higher taxes
and increasing competition for scarce jobs and apartments. And as East Germans flock
through the Berlin Wall to shop, there are fears that a promise to exchange their marks
for West German ones will fuel inflation and weaken the currency."
On CBC, positive statements centered on East Germany going to a market economy, and German
strength in the economic community. For example, in a "Journal" interview on 1
March 1990, Gordon Craig, professor of Humanities at Stanford University stated:
"There's no doubt about it, Germany will be a stronger part of the European
"On CBC, positive statements
centered on East Germany going to a market economy, and German strength in the economic
community."
community. The German currency is pretty well
the currency of Western Europe already. No, there's no doubt at all that Germany will be a
stronger economic power, but it will be working within the European community."
The majority of the critical attention to economics focused on employment problems in East
Germany as a result of the events. For example, on 12 September 1990, CBC's Joe
Schlesinger translated an East German woman: "'Then, at least,' says Mariam Winter,
'we knew that we had a job to come to every day.' At the East Berlin coffee maker plant
where Winter works, 400 employees, a third of the work force, have already been laid off,
and at least 400 more will have to go, if this factory is to survive." Later in the
story Schlesinger reports a similar theme on East German farms: "'People here are
very disillusioned,' says Maria Bentine. Bentine is the manager of a co-op farm at
Geswalde, 120 kilometres southeast of Berlin. Under the Communists, the hundred farm
workers here were relatively well off. Now the co-op is just about broke. As in the
factory, there are simply too many workers and too little machinery to allow the farm to
survive in a free market economy. It costs the co-op twice as much to shear a sheep than
its wool will fetch on the market. Under the Communist regime, the state bought everything
the farm could produce at guaranteed prices. Now the co-op is reducing its herds, because
it loses money on every pig it sells."
Networks Provide Balanced Attention to the Military
Attention to the military comprised 13 percent of CBC and 16 percent of CTV coverage on
unification. Of the attention to the military, one third was neutral. Of statements which
provided assessments, slightly more were negative than positive.
For instance, Gorbachev's position that the Soviet Union did not want a
"...at least we know that we had a
job to come to every day."
unified Germany was balanced with Manfred
Woerner's statements on cooperation. For example, in a 14 July 1990 "National,"
Anna Maria Tremonti discussed the role of NATO in the negotiations for unifying Germany.
Anna Maria Tremonti: The new Germany will belong to NATO. Woerner told reporters he
understands the Soviet anxiety over a more powerful Germany in the Western alliance, but
he argued it's misplaced.
Manfred Woerner: ... that the membership of a united Germany in our alliance would
increase stability and would not be a threat of any kind to the Soviet Union.
Anna Maria Tremonti: The Soviets continue to oppose NATO involvement in a new Germany.
CBC's Coverage of International Consequences More Negative Than CTV
Coverage of international ramifications of a unified Germany was presented in 6 percent of
CBC and 5 percent of CTV
"There are simply too many workers
and too little machinery to allow the farm to survive in a free market economy."
attention. Over half of CBC and almost half of
CTV statements this issue were neutral and factual. Of the remainder, almost three
quarters of CBC statements were negative, while on CTV there were only slightly more
negative than positive statements.
One issue to which both networks gave more negative attention was how Germany's past in
international affairs might be repeated in the future. For example, on 30 June 1990,
Terrilyn Joe
"... there are fears that
reunification will recreate the old Germany that carried out the holocaust of the Second
World War."
introduced a "CTV National News" story
on economic union: "In Israel, there are fears that reunification will recreate the
old Germany that carried out the holocaust of the Second World War." On the 1 June
1990 "Journal" Henry Kissinger argued: "It's a Germany that is conducting
its policy based entirely on its own perception of its own interest. That, we have learned
in this century, is the most dangerous Germany."
CBC Provides More Neutral Coverage On Social Issues
There were some differences in the two networks' coverage of social issues. Social issues
comprised 9 percent of CBC and 7 percent of CTV attention. While on CBC the neutral social
effects of change were presented in over one third of the statements, on CTV, neutral
coverage comprised one-fifth of the statements. In their statements assessing the social
effects of change, both networks provided slightly more positive than negative statements.
Social issues were addressed through stories about reunited families and East and West
Germans attitudes to each other. For example, on 10 November 1989, Philip Winslow reported
on the "CTV National News": "They came to touch the wall together, a kind
of reunion of strangers, and the mood was euphoric." Similarly, on 12 November 1989
Claude Adams reported on "Sunday Report": "West Berliners celebrated the
day as if it were the merging of a divided city. Visitors from the East who poured in
through the historic Potsdamer Platz received a welcome that brought many to tears. Mayors
of East and West Berlin shook hands."
General Statements on Unification
Almost one third of network attention examined what the future would be like if the two
Germanies were to unite. The majority of this discussion revolved around general arguments
for and against unification, such as the issue of the time frame for unification, German
borders and the impact on East Germany.
While almost half of CBC's unification coverage was neutral, only one
"They came to touch the wall
together, a kind of reunion of strangers, and the mood was euphoric."
quarter of CTV's attention was neutral. Of the
coverage assessing the general pros and cons of unification, CBC provided more balanced
coverage than did CTV. CBC gave only slightly more positive than negative statements,
while CTV's statements were almost two to one in favour of unification.
Much of the positive coverage reflected international agreements which supported
unification. For example, on 12 September 1990, Lloyd Robertson reported: "The four
leading allies of the Second World War took an historic step today, clearing the way for
East and
"...even the Soviet Union went
along..."
West Germany to again become one country. Along
with the two Germanies, they signed a treaty approving reunification of the country they
split apart at the end of the war. Despite objections, even the Soviet Union went along,
saying the new Germany has learned the lessons of history."
NEGATIVE ASPECTS OF COMMUNIST AND NAZI HISTORY HIGHLIGHTED
German history was featured in almost one tenth of total network attention. Within the
history discussions, almost half of CBC and half of CTV's attention was neutral and
factual. Of the remainder, however, 7 out of 10 statements on CBC and 8 out of ten
statements on CTV focused on the negative aspects of German history.
The negative attention ranged from Nazism to Stalinism and from the STAZI to the Berlin
wall. Angela Stent, a political scientist from Georgetown University, remarked on a 2
October 1990 "Journal" interview: "So, they're going to have to learn first
of all what it means to be German, and I think in that process the East German population,
the 16 million new Germans, if you like, that are coming into this union on Wednesday,
will really have to come to terms with its doubly dark past. They have yet to come to
terms with the Nazi past, and then they have to come to terms with their communist
past." Similarly, on a 7 November 1989 "Journal" interview, Franz Loeser,
an East German academic, told Barbara Frum: "The situation in East Germany is like
this: for 40 years this Stalinist dictatorship has suppressed and indoctrinated, and
degraded the people."
On 12 December 1989, Lloyd Robertson introduced a story on the STAZI: "Perhaps the
most dramatic example of the changes in East Germany can be found at the headquarters of
the secret state police in Leipzig. It was from there that the authorities terrorized the
citizens. Now the citizens are in control, and, if anything, it's the authorities in
terror, in terror that evidence will turn up to implicate them in crimes against the
people. John Lawrence, of ABC News, reports.
John Lawrence: For more than a week now, anti-government demonstrators have been occupying
part of the headquarters of the secret police in Leipzig, once the instrument of state
terror in East Germany. Since the 1950s the State Security Police, better known as the
STAZI, held the population in a grip of fear, using imprisonment and torture."
In a 19 February 1990 "CTV National News" story, Bert Quint of CBS News reminded
viewers of the history of the Berlin Wall: "The East German state spent a fortune
building and maintaining this wall, and shooting people who tried to cross it."
NETWORKS RELY ON PUBLIC AND ACADEMICS FOR STATEMENTS
Almost two-thirds of CBC and three quarters of CTV statements on Germany originated with
reporters or anchors filing the story. Figure B shows that of
the remainder of statements, on CBC the most comment came from the academic community,
comprising over one-quarter of coverage. In contrast, academics' statements comprised only
6 percent of CTV coverage. Statements from the general public, on the other hand,
comprised over one tenth of CBC and almost one-tenth of CTV sources' statements.
Click here to view Figure B: Affiliation of Sources
Both networks provided more statements from East German government officials and
politicians than from West German politicians. However, CTV relied more on government
sources than did CBC. For example, on CTV, East German government officials received 13
percent of the coverage, whereas on CBC they received 5 percent of the attention.
Of note is the finding that journalists were used as sources in almost 10 percent of both
networks' coverage. In those cases, a journalist did not file a story but was interviewed
by another reporter.
CTV'S COVERAGE MORE DEPENDENT ON EVENTS
As Figure C shows, coverage of major events such as border
openings, the fall of the Berlin Wall and the political and economic union of the two
Germanies, accounted for 12 percent of CBC and 16 percent of CTV's overall coverage.
Almost one third of CBC and over one third of CTV's news items on events were on the fall
of the Berlin Wall. The opening of the border comprised one fifth of CBC and almost one
quarter of CTV's coverage of events.
Click here to view Figure C: Genreal Story Information
Similarly, one fifth of both networks' coverage involved reporting process issues, such as
protests, celebrations, meetings between leaders, and speeches.
Interestingly, the elections held in October 1989 and March 1990 comprised only one
percent of CBC and three percent of CTV overall attention.
Discussions about political leaders such as Honecker or Bush, and prominent personalities,
such as skater Kattarina Witt, comprised 6 percent of CBC and 5 percent of CTV attention.
Attention to Germany Peaks in Fall of 1989
Predictably, news coverage given to Germany peaked with the most obvious symbol of change,
the tearing down of the Berlin Wall. 18 percent of CBC and 16 percent of CTV overall
attention to Germany was reported in October of 1989. This period saw border openings, the
mass exodus from East Germany and the removal of Eric Honecker from office. In November,
when the wall was torn down, network attention increased to 29 percent of both networks'
coverage over the year. By December, coverage dropped substantially to 12 and 13 percent,
respectively, of CBC and CTV coverage. Attention to Germany has not increased since that
time.
EASTERN LIFESTYLES EMPHASIZED
Reports of East and West Germans' living conditions and backgrounds were presented in 18
percent of CBC and 17 percent of CTV overall coverage. 9 out of every 10 statements made
about living conditions, attitudes and freedoms were about East Germany. [This finding marks a significant change in coverage. Past research found
that international coverage tends to downplay the human face of eastern bloc nations. See
for example, Robert Hackett, "Coups, Earthquakes and Hostages? Foreign News on
Canadian Television" Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1989, 22:4:809-825; Barry
Zwicker, War, Peace and the Media (Toronto: Sources, 1984).]
In covering East German lifestyles, half of CBC's and almost half of CTV's reports
consisted of simply describing living conditions. For example, on a 13
"Everybody lied to each other....We
faked enthusiasm and they faked warm feeling toward the population."
November 1989 "Journal," Brian Stewart
began with the following opening: "Even in moments of crisis, there are always the
backyard areas: the small towns, the countryside, where life goes on to timeless rhythms
with no great fuss. And in East Germany many people are making that crucial decision
whether to leave or stay very calmly, well away from the turmoil of Berlin, and the street
demonstrations."
Of the remaining statements, almost twice as many CBC and CTV statements provided critical
commentary on East German living conditions. Some of these statements focused on the
difficult conditions in the past. A professor commented in an 1 October 1990
"Journal" story: "Everybody lied to each other. We put up, we did, we, we
faked enthusiasm and they faked warm feeling toward the population. We faked working, they
faked paying us with money. I think the whole thing was sort of absurd theatre."
Similarly, CTV's Philip Winslow reported on 12 November 1989: "For most people in the
East, life is, life is fairly drab, and that is the main thing, is just transforming their
own lives and escaping from the steel-ringed prison they've been in for nearly 30
years."
Of note is the distinction made in the coverage of East Germany between communism and
socialism. While both networks clearly presented negative coverage of communism, coverage
of socialism was more favourable than unfavourable. For example, on 7 October 1989, CTV's
Roger Smith stated: "But in this street corner debate, even those who most proudly
defend socialism supported reforms that didn't go too far towards capitalism."
Despite the negative reports on how East Germans lived under communism, many stories
reported that the East Germans' quality of life would decrease with the wall coming down.
For example, on 10 September 1989, Allen Abel of CBC provided this analysis: "There
may be millions more out of work before a new East German economy can be built from the
wreckage of the old; more pain, more frustration." A translated statement from a man
on the street followed: "I work on the black market. I worked for years, but now
that's all I have. If it isn't enough, I break a few windows and get what I need."
Later in the story Abel described the life of a circus performer: "Eduardo the clown
spent four years at circus school in Moscow, learning his trade. But when this show is
over he'll have to pack up his poodle and head home: to Havana, Cuba." Eduardo gave
his story through an interpreter: "Very sad. Very sad. Because many people will be
without work. Last year the circus was full. And now the people don't come...The people
are a little like crazy. Buying many things. For example, a new refrigerator. It has to be
a certain brand. They don't want just any brand. Everything. Clothing, this, that. I think
it has great influence on the closing of the circus."
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
I have read copies of your January and February editions. The concept behind both the
newsletter and the Archive are great. This type of material is something that has been
missing for some time. It helps put things in perspective.
Having said that, I was somewhat disappointed in the analysis made in "The Changing
Television News Agenda," in 1990: A Year in Review. Specifically, I disagree with the
conclusions drawn with regard to the media as a reflection of public opinion. Any pollster
will tell you that a given survey reflects opinion at a particular time and not any other
time. The Macleans/Decima poll was taken in November, 1990, well after Meech Lake and some
time after Oka. The GST legislation was before Parliament at the
"The concept behind both the
newsletter and the archive are great."
time and was a primary topic for individuals and
the media for that period (November).
Naturally in November, the GST signified top of mind concern for the greatest number of
Canadians. If the poll was taken in June, Meech Lake might have been Number 1 and if taken
in late August, the same might be said of Oka. Therefore I disagree with the remark
"...it is clear that television does not mirror the public's concerns." That may
or may not turn out to be true but it cannot be determined from the limited source used.
Peggy Hobart
Issues Analyst
METHODOLOGY
Results are based on census samples of 190 "National," 40 "Journal," 2
"Venture," and 2 "Sunday Report" stories as well as 226 "CTV
National News" stories for a year commencing October 1, 1989.
All stories appearing during the year were coded representing a total population rather
than a random sample of stories.
Four researchers were employed in coding the news stories. The researchers were selected
on the basis of their differing political views. To assess the clarity of the research
instrument and measure consistency, tests of inter-coder reliability were conducted
throughout the procedure. A high level of intercoder reliability (.79) was obtained. Any
disagreements in assessments by researchers were discussed, and the rating was changed
until consensus was reached on all stories.
Further information or details on the coding design and methods used may be obtained by
contacting The National Media Archive.
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
| |
|
|
|
Last Modified: Wednesday, October 20, 1999.
|
|