Public Policy Sources #38: Small Governments, Large Powers
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
Third Order governments as visualized by the Indian Industry have tremendous
powers. On a world scale, these "tremendous powers" are trivial. Yet from
the point of view of an Indian subject to a Third Order government, the
powers are indeed overwhelming.
Imagine you live in a municipality where the Mayor and Council have an
absolute veto over whether you have a house or not, whether your plumbing
gets fixed, whether you have access to the transportation pool, whether
your child can get a scholarship to university, and whether you have a
government job when such jobs are about the only ones available.
Imagine that the Mayor and Council can really run the education system
rather than the professionals if they so chose. Imagine this same group
has total control over business licensing (including paramountcy over all
federal and provincial powers, which no municipality has) and over property
zoning. Imagine all of this with essentially no outside appeal, no matter
what might be said.
Imagine, most frighteningly, that most of the money that flows through
your community is controlled by politicians.
Imagine further, that the system is set up to deliberately minimize citizen
contact with other governments, in terms of services or financial payments
and receipts.
Imagine that elections are decided by a few handsful of people voting basically
along family lines, the "ins" versus the "outs."
This is what can happen with small governments wielding large powers. This
is the fact of government on many reserves today. The unhappy results have
absolutely nothing to do with ethnicity or culture. People are people all
around the world. Power corrupts. That is why free societies always seek
to control power in designing governance systems. We should not be so blind
as to ignore the possibility that pervasive treaty-conferred power might
not corrupt its aboriginal recipients just as surely as if they were non-aboriginal.
When governments are given power over the people to the extent that those
governments can control elections by controlling voters, "democracy" ceases
to have meaning.
The model treaties before us today would constitutionalize such powers
and cast them in concrete. By contrast, the standard municipal model, well
understood throughout British Columbia with its limitations on power and
institutionalized checks and balances, makes such a nightmare scenario
impossible.
[Previous]
[Contents]
[Next]
info@fraserinstitute.ca
You can contact us at the above email address for any comments or information requests. Please report any dead links or technical problems.
|
| |
|
|
|
Last Modified: Thursday, August 5, 1999.
|
|